<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 249 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83949</link>
    <description>Processing semi-finished motor vehicle parts by machining, trimming, welding and painting was treated as manufacture because the operations produced duty-paid finished goods. On that basis, Modvat credit on the inputs used in the process was held to be admissible, and the denial of credit was unjustified. The fact that duty was collected on the final products supported the conclusion that a manufactured product emerged after processing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 249 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83949</link>
      <description>Processing semi-finished motor vehicle parts by machining, trimming, welding and painting was treated as manufacture because the operations produced duty-paid finished goods. On that basis, Modvat credit on the inputs used in the process was held to be admissible, and the denial of credit was unjustified. The fact that duty was collected on the final products supported the conclusion that a manufactured product emerged after processing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>