https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83929 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) depends on whether the cause of action, wholly or in part, arose within the Court's territory. In a pre-execution challenge to a preventive detention order issued by the Government of Gujarat, the High Court held that a mere apprehension of arrest at Indore did not form an integral part of the cause of action. The detention order was made at Gandhinagar, the seizure and related criminal proceedings were outside the State, and no material showed any part of the cause of action within the Court's territorial limits. The Court therefore lacked territorial jurisdiction and declined to entertain the writ petition. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83929 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) depends on whether the cause of action, wholly or in part, arose within the Court's territory. In a pre-execution challenge to a preventive detention order issued by the Government of Gujarat, the High Court held that a mere apprehension of arrest at Indore did not form an integral part of the cause of action. The detention order was made at Gandhinagar, the seizure and related criminal proceedings were outside the State, and no material showed any part of the cause of action within the Court's territorial limits. The Court therefore lacked territorial jurisdiction and declined to entertain the writ petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83929