<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. P.C. Metal Industries, holding that the Choke covers should be classified under sub-heading No. 8504.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as other articles of iron or steel. The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 43,200, considering the appellants&#039; financial hardship and the classification dispute. The decision was made to ensure justice and alleviate the financial burden on the appellants pending the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. P.C. Metal Industries, holding that the Choke covers should be classified under sub-heading No. 8504.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as other articles of iron or steel. The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 43,200, considering the appellants&#039; financial hardship and the classification dispute. The decision was made to ensure justice and alleviate the financial burden on the appellants pending the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>