https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83864 Time spent pursuing alternative remedies before the High Court and Supreme Court is not automatically excludible for condonation of delay unless supported by a specific judicial direction or other legally sufficient basis. In the absence of such direction, the appellant must protect the statutory remedy by filing the appeal within limitation. The delay was therefore not condoned, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred. en-us Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:11:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83864 Time spent pursuing alternative remedies before the High Court and Supreme Court is not automatically excludible for condonation of delay unless supported by a specific judicial direction or other legally sufficient basis. In the absence of such direction, the appellant must protect the statutory remedy by filing the appeal within limitation. The delay was therefore not condoned, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83864