<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 168 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83856</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for non-prosecution and default in appearance was restored after counsel later appeared, explained the delay, and stated that the required papers had been filed. Those circumstances led to reversal of the earlier dismissal order. Restoration was allowed, and the appeal was directed to be heard on the merits on the next date fixed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 168 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83856</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for non-prosecution and default in appearance was restored after counsel later appeared, explained the delay, and stated that the required papers had been filed. Those circumstances led to reversal of the earlier dismissal order. Restoration was allowed, and the appeal was directed to be heard on the merits on the next date fixed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>