<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83846</link>
    <description>Recovery of redemption fine arising from finalisation of a provisional assessment of imported goods was stayed where the duty component had already been paid. The Tribunal held that, on the peculiar facts, its discretionary powers justified protection against recovery of the redemption fine and followed the cited Tribunal precedent. Stay of recovery of the redemption fine was therefore granted in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83846</link>
      <description>Recovery of redemption fine arising from finalisation of a provisional assessment of imported goods was stayed where the duty component had already been paid. The Tribunal held that, on the peculiar facts, its discretionary powers justified protection against recovery of the redemption fine and followed the cited Tribunal precedent. Stay of recovery of the redemption fine was therefore granted in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>