https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83842 Customs authorities are expected to implement a Tribunal order in the ordinary course where no stay has been granted by the Supreme Court or High Court. Mere pendency of an appeal does not justify withholding compliance with an unimplemented order. An application under Rule 40 of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 therefore lies to seek enforcement of the earlier order, and the authorities may be directed to give effect to it without further delay, preferably within one month. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:51:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83842 Customs authorities are expected to implement a Tribunal order in the ordinary course where no stay has been granted by the Supreme Court or High Court. Mere pendency of an appeal does not justify withholding compliance with an unimplemented order. An application under Rule 40 of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 therefore lies to seek enforcement of the earlier order, and the authorities may be directed to give effect to it without further delay, preferably within one month. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83842