<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83838</link>
    <description>The order was set aside because the appellants were denied a proper opportunity of hearing, as notice of the adjourned hearing was not effectively communicated to the consultant and the authority proceeded without ensuring a reasonable hearing. That breach of natural justice rendered the original order unsustainable, and the matter was remitted to the original authority for reconsideration after granting a fair opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:43:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83838</link>
      <description>The order was set aside because the appellants were denied a proper opportunity of hearing, as notice of the adjourned hearing was not effectively communicated to the consultant and the authority proceeded without ensuring a reasonable hearing. That breach of natural justice rendered the original order unsustainable, and the matter was remitted to the original authority for reconsideration after granting a fair opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>