<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning misdeclaration of imported goods for a detailed inquiry to determine value based on relevant evidence, emphasizing the need for contemporaneous evidence and adherence to Customs Valuation Rules. Failure to establish undervaluation with such evidence would result in accepting the declared price as the transaction value, disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning misdeclaration of imported goods for a detailed inquiry to determine value based on relevant evidence, emphasizing the need for contemporaneous evidence and adherence to Customs Valuation Rules. Failure to establish undervaluation with such evidence would result in accepting the declared price as the transaction value, disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>