https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83829 In an NDPS bail matter, the Court held that bail is not warranted on a general allegation of procedural irregularity unless a mandatory violation in search, seizure or arrest is shown. It examined the distinction between mandatory and directory compliance, noted that the search was conducted on authorisation, and found that the contraband was seized from the accused's house and the seizure and arrest were reported as asserted by the prosecution. As no serious non-compliance with the statutory search and seizure requirements was established, the prosecution case was not vitiated and bail was refused. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:06:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83829 In an NDPS bail matter, the Court held that bail is not warranted on a general allegation of procedural irregularity unless a mandatory violation in search, seizure or arrest is shown. It examined the distinction between mandatory and directory compliance, noted that the search was conducted on authorisation, and found that the contraband was seized from the accused's house and the seizure and arrest were reported as asserted by the prosecution. As no serious non-compliance with the statutory search and seizure requirements was established, the prosecution case was not vitiated and bail was refused. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83829