<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83823</link>
    <description>A beneficial import policy provision allowing delayed shipment under a firm contract was applied liberally where the letter of credit was opened within time, the contract was registered with the bank, and shipment delay resulted from circumstances beyond the importer&#039;s control. The contract was treated as a firm commitment for shipment within the policy period despite an inspection condition, and the supplier&#039;s inability to ship on time brought the case within the Open General Licence allowance for longer delivery periods. The import was therefore held covered by paragraph 7 of Appendix 10, and confiscation and redemption fine were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:48:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83823</link>
      <description>A beneficial import policy provision allowing delayed shipment under a firm contract was applied liberally where the letter of credit was opened within time, the contract was registered with the bank, and shipment delay resulted from circumstances beyond the importer&#039;s control. The contract was treated as a firm commitment for shipment within the policy period despite an inspection condition, and the supplier&#039;s inability to ship on time brought the case within the Open General Licence allowance for longer delivery periods. The import was therefore held covered by paragraph 7 of Appendix 10, and confiscation and redemption fine were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>