<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 291 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83814</link>
    <description>A discretionary refusal of approval under Rule 56B affecting an assessee&#039;s facility could not stand where no personal hearing was given and no reasons were recorded; the non-speaking order was set aside for breach of natural justice and fair play. The matter was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the assessee, with a time-bound direction for reconsideration. Interim continuance of the facility was permitted pending redetermination, subject to revenue safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 291 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83814</link>
      <description>A discretionary refusal of approval under Rule 56B affecting an assessee&#039;s facility could not stand where no personal hearing was given and no reasons were recorded; the non-speaking order was set aside for breach of natural justice and fair play. The matter was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the assessee, with a time-bound direction for reconsideration. Interim continuance of the facility was permitted pending redetermination, subject to revenue safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>