<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83806</link>
    <description>A product identified by chemical test as toluene, containing only trace impurities, was treated as a separate chemically defined organic compound for tariff classification. Classification was to be determined primarily from the tariff heading read with the relevant section notes and chapter notes; HSN explanatory notes were only a guide and could not override the tariff text. Because Chapter 29 covers separate chemically defined organic compounds, whether or not containing impurities, and the department failed to show that the product was a mixture or otherwise fell within Chapter 27, the product was classified under Heading 2902.30 in Chapter 29. The assessee&#039;s purity certificates supported that conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83806</link>
      <description>A product identified by chemical test as toluene, containing only trace impurities, was treated as a separate chemically defined organic compound for tariff classification. Classification was to be determined primarily from the tariff heading read with the relevant section notes and chapter notes; HSN explanatory notes were only a guide and could not override the tariff text. Because Chapter 29 covers separate chemically defined organic compounds, whether or not containing impurities, and the department failed to show that the product was a mixture or otherwise fell within Chapter 27, the product was classified under Heading 2902.30 in Chapter 29. The assessee&#039;s purity certificates supported that conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>