<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83797</link>
    <description>Confiscation and penalty for alleged trafficking in non-transferable import licences were set aside where the goods were found outside the licence cover and no specific show-cause notice was issued to some noticees. The imported minilab equipment was held to fall within the relevant Open General Licence entry because the specific sub-entry controlled over the broad heading, and project import concessional duty benefit was allowed. The valuation orders were found unsustainable because one was non-speaking and the other required fresh evidence-based determination, so both were remanded. A mere administrative warning was held not to be an appealable quasi-judicial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83797</link>
      <description>Confiscation and penalty for alleged trafficking in non-transferable import licences were set aside where the goods were found outside the licence cover and no specific show-cause notice was issued to some noticees. The imported minilab equipment was held to fall within the relevant Open General Licence entry because the specific sub-entry controlled over the broad heading, and project import concessional duty benefit was allowed. The valuation orders were found unsustainable because one was non-speaking and the other required fresh evidence-based determination, so both were remanded. A mere administrative warning was held not to be an appealable quasi-judicial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>