https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83787 Contempt for wilful disobedience was not made out where the order for supply of documents and inspection in a departmental proceeding was substantially complied with by permitting inspection within time. The alleged failure to furnish copies was treated as secondary to the main relief of inspection and did not show deliberate defiance. The Court reiterated that contempt jurisdiction should not be used for trifling or trivial defaults, and that an ambiguous or imprecise order, or one not proved to have been wilfully disobeyed, cannot sustain a contempt finding. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jul 2011 17:36:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83787 Contempt for wilful disobedience was not made out where the order for supply of documents and inspection in a departmental proceeding was substantially complied with by permitting inspection within time. The alleged failure to furnish copies was treated as secondary to the main relief of inspection and did not show deliberate defiance. The Court reiterated that contempt jurisdiction should not be used for trifling or trivial defaults, and that an ambiguous or imprecise order, or one not proved to have been wilfully disobeyed, cannot sustain a contempt finding. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83787