<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 213 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83774</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked where the assessee had disclosed its manufacturing activity from inception, filed declarations, and sought excise advice, while the department had already visited the factory, drawn samples, and obtained the chemical examiner&#039;s report before issuing notice. On those facts, there was no suppression of material facts or wilful misstatement, so the demand issued after departmental knowledge of the relevant facts was time-barred. The assessee therefore succeeded on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:37:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 213 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83774</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked where the assessee had disclosed its manufacturing activity from inception, filed declarations, and sought excise advice, while the department had already visited the factory, drawn samples, and obtained the chemical examiner&#039;s report before issuing notice. On those facts, there was no suppression of material facts or wilful misstatement, so the demand issued after departmental knowledge of the relevant facts was time-barred. The assessee therefore succeeded on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>