<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83761</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demand on branded and unbranded biris found short during a surprise visit by Central Excise officers, reducing the penalty to Rs. 500. Despite arguments on stock discrepancies, ownership changes, and storage capacity, the tribunal held the appellant responsible for the shortage based on evidence presented during inspection. The appeal challenging the duty demand was rejected, affirming the Adjudicating authority&#039;s decision and dismissing cross objections as mere comments on the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83761</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demand on branded and unbranded biris found short during a surprise visit by Central Excise officers, reducing the penalty to Rs. 500. Despite arguments on stock discrepancies, ownership changes, and storage capacity, the tribunal held the appellant responsible for the shortage based on evidence presented during inspection. The appeal challenging the duty demand was rejected, affirming the Adjudicating authority&#039;s decision and dismissing cross objections as mere comments on the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>