<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 164 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83752</link>
    <description>The appeal succeeded solely on the ground of time bar, with the lower authorities&#039; orders set aside. The judgment of the Bombay High Court in M/s. Swan Mills Ltd. was deemed inapplicable. The decision emphasized the importance of issuing demand notices under Section 11A within the permissible period for rectifying errors in eligibility for set-off under relevant notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 164 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83752</link>
      <description>The appeal succeeded solely on the ground of time bar, with the lower authorities&#039; orders set aside. The judgment of the Bombay High Court in M/s. Swan Mills Ltd. was deemed inapplicable. The decision emphasized the importance of issuing demand notices under Section 11A within the permissible period for rectifying errors in eligibility for set-off under relevant notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>