https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83746 Duty could not be demanded on molasses stored in kutcha pits and destroyed with departmental permission where the facts showed express permission for storage and subsequent destruction of deteriorated stock. On that basis, Rule 49 did not require duty to be discharged on the destroyed molasses. Any additional liability said to arise from the bond could only be enforced separately in accordance with law and could not expand the Tribunal's power beyond the statutory rules. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:45:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83746 Duty could not be demanded on molasses stored in kutcha pits and destroyed with departmental permission where the facts showed express permission for storage and subsequent destruction of deteriorated stock. On that basis, Rule 49 did not require duty to be discharged on the destroyed molasses. Any additional liability said to arise from the bond could only be enforced separately in accordance with law and could not expand the Tribunal's power beyond the statutory rules. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83746