<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 154 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83698</link>
    <description>A variation in the tariff entry in a Rule 57G declaration does not, by itself, disentitle Modvat credit where the input description was already clearly declared. The declaration had identified the industrial laminated sheets of paper base, and the credit was denied only because the tariff description was not perfectly matched before later correction. On that basis, denial of Modvat credit was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 154 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83698</link>
      <description>A variation in the tariff entry in a Rule 57G declaration does not, by itself, disentitle Modvat credit where the input description was already clearly declared. The declaration had identified the industrial laminated sheets of paper base, and the credit was denied only because the tariff description was not perfectly matched before later correction. On that basis, denial of Modvat credit was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>