https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83697 A composite excise demand order found to be vitiated by violation of natural justice could not be partly sustained and partly remanded on the basis of the same defective adjudication. Once the appellate authority accepted that the order suffered from a common procedural defect, the entire demand required de novo consideration by the original authority. The matter, including the portion relating to Protobex, was therefore sent back for fresh adjudication. en-us Mon, 01 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:06:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83697 A composite excise demand order found to be vitiated by violation of natural justice could not be partly sustained and partly remanded on the basis of the same defective adjudication. Once the appellate authority accepted that the order suffered from a common procedural defect, the entire demand required de novo consideration by the original authority. The matter, including the portion relating to Protobex, was therefore sent back for fresh adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83697