<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 196 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83694</link>
    <description>A prima facie exemption claim under Notification No. 217/86 for ammonia used in the manufacture of melamine was found sufficient for interim protection, because the authorities below had not examined that plea. The objection that ammonia was used through molten urea did not displace the claim at the stay stage. Conditional relief was granted by requiring a personal bond for the duty amount within four weeks, and recovery of the duty was stayed and waived on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:46:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 196 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83694</link>
      <description>A prima facie exemption claim under Notification No. 217/86 for ammonia used in the manufacture of melamine was found sufficient for interim protection, because the authorities below had not examined that plea. The objection that ammonia was used through molten urea did not displace the claim at the stay stage. Conditional relief was granted by requiring a personal bond for the duty amount within four weeks, and recovery of the duty was stayed and waived on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>