<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83674</link>
    <description>Micronutrients composed of sulphates of Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo and B were treated as plant growth regulators under Heading 38.08 because classification had to follow the tariff description and chapter notes, and Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31 limited &quot;other fertilisers&quot; to products containing at least one major nutrient, N, P or K, which these products lacked. The Explanatory Notes to HSN Chapter 38 supported their use in trace quantities to improve plant growth and yield. On limitation and penalty, long-standing classification doubt and prior contrary treatment meant mere non-declaration was insufficient; absent positive suppression or comparable culpable conduct, extended limitation and penalty were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83674</link>
      <description>Micronutrients composed of sulphates of Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo and B were treated as plant growth regulators under Heading 38.08 because classification had to follow the tariff description and chapter notes, and Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31 limited &quot;other fertilisers&quot; to products containing at least one major nutrient, N, P or K, which these products lacked. The Explanatory Notes to HSN Chapter 38 supported their use in trace quantities to improve plant growth and yield. On limitation and penalty, long-standing classification doubt and prior contrary treatment meant mere non-declaration was insufficient; absent positive suppression or comparable culpable conduct, extended limitation and penalty were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>