https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83658 The Tribunal found that the earlier order had proceeded on a mistaken identification of the appeal, because the recalled matter involved enhancement of assessable value based on cost of production and overhead charges for supply of nuts and bolts, not the connected issue of exclusion of inspection charges. Since no finding had been recorded on the issue actually raised in Appeal No. E/889/93-A, the prior order required recall. The recall application was allowed and the appeal was restored for fresh hearing on merits. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:55:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83658 The Tribunal found that the earlier order had proceeded on a mistaken identification of the appeal, because the recalled matter involved enhancement of assessable value based on cost of production and overhead charges for supply of nuts and bolts, not the connected issue of exclusion of inspection charges. Since no finding had been recorded on the issue actually raised in Appeal No. E/889/93-A, the prior order required recall. The recall application was allowed and the appeal was restored for fresh hearing on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83658