<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83650</link>
    <description>Typewriter ribbons were held not importable under Open General Licence under the 1988-91 Import and Export Policy because para 21(f) imposed a specific exclusion for goods covered by the relevant appendices unless the policy expressly permitted import. A clarification issued under the 1985-88 policy could not control imports made under the later policy, and the OGL-linked appendix did not override the express bar. In the absence of a valid import licence, the import was unauthorised, so confiscation and penalty were sustained. However, on the importer&#039;s actual-user status and the facts of the case, the redemption fine was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83650</link>
      <description>Typewriter ribbons were held not importable under Open General Licence under the 1988-91 Import and Export Policy because para 21(f) imposed a specific exclusion for goods covered by the relevant appendices unless the policy expressly permitted import. A clarification issued under the 1985-88 policy could not control imports made under the later policy, and the OGL-linked appendix did not override the express bar. In the absence of a valid import licence, the import was unauthorised, so confiscation and penalty were sustained. However, on the importer&#039;s actual-user status and the facts of the case, the redemption fine was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>