https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83645 The Tribunal noted that the appeal remained defective because no proper application had been filed to amend the appeal memo, despite time being granted to cure the defect. When the matter was called, no response or filing from the appellant was on record, and the appellant had failed to take the required procedural steps even after an opportunity in the interest of justice. The appeal was therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. en-us Tue, 25 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:14:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83645 The Tribunal noted that the appeal remained defective because no proper application had been filed to amend the appeal memo, despite time being granted to cure the defect. When the matter was called, no response or filing from the appellant was on record, and the appellant had failed to take the required procedural steps even after an opportunity in the interest of justice. The appeal was therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83645