https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83644 Where the respondent had not been shown to be served with notice and did not appear despite repeated opportunities, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The record indicated that the notice meant for service was forwarded to the Collector, but service on the respondent remained unverified. The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to prosecute the matter and treated the absence of service and non-appearance as sufficient grounds to close the appeal. The small monetary stake was noted, but the dismissal rested on want of prosecution rather than the merits. en-us Tue, 25 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:12:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83644 Where the respondent had not been shown to be served with notice and did not appear despite repeated opportunities, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The record indicated that the notice meant for service was forwarded to the Collector, but service on the respondent remained unverified. The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to prosecute the matter and treated the absence of service and non-appearance as sufficient grounds to close the appeal. The small monetary stake was noted, but the dismissal rested on want of prosecution rather than the merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83644