<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83642</link>
    <description>Serial No. 2 of Notification No. 189/73-C.E. was construed as requiring only that sugar produced from 1-12-1973 to 30-4-1974 exceed 110% of the corresponding period in the previous year; it did not require production to commence exactly on 1-12-1973. On that reading, a manufacturer who began production on 10-12-1973 and met the production benchmark satisfied the notification and was entitled to the concessional duty rate on the excess quantity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83642</link>
      <description>Serial No. 2 of Notification No. 189/73-C.E. was construed as requiring only that sugar produced from 1-12-1973 to 30-4-1974 exceed 110% of the corresponding period in the previous year; it did not require production to commence exactly on 1-12-1973. On that reading, a manufacturer who began production on 10-12-1973 and met the production benchmark satisfied the notification and was entitled to the concessional duty rate on the excess quantity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>