<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83641</link>
    <description>Gears and gearing were expressly covered by Tariff Heading 84.83, and the interpretative framework of the Central Excise Tariff placed that heading ahead of Heading 84.48 under Interpretative Rule 3(c). On that basis, the earlier omission in classification was capable of correction consistently with the stated tariff interpretation. The operative conclusion was that gears and gearing fell under Heading 84.83 and not under Heading 84.48.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:06:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83641</link>
      <description>Gears and gearing were expressly covered by Tariff Heading 84.83, and the interpretative framework of the Central Excise Tariff placed that heading ahead of Heading 84.48 under Interpretative Rule 3(c). On that basis, the earlier omission in classification was capable of correction consistently with the stated tariff interpretation. The operative conclusion was that gears and gearing fell under Heading 84.83 and not under Heading 84.48.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>