<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 145 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that different discounts can be allowed to customers within the same category, emphasizing that commercial considerations justify variations. Trade discounts need not be uniform, as long as they comply with statutory conditions and are based on commercial reasons. The Tribunal clarified that the Act does not mandate uniformity in trade discounts and upheld the appeal, allowing for different rates of trade discounts based on legitimate commercial factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 145 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that different discounts can be allowed to customers within the same category, emphasizing that commercial considerations justify variations. Trade discounts need not be uniform, as long as they comply with statutory conditions and are based on commercial reasons. The Tribunal clarified that the Act does not mandate uniformity in trade discounts and upheld the appeal, allowing for different rates of trade discounts based on legitimate commercial factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>