https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83633 A corrigendum issued after the hearing had concluded introduced substitution and addition of charges, and the appellants were denied adequate opportunity to answer the new allegations or adduce evidence. Because the revised charges affected the valuation dispute and the nature of sales to independent buyers, the record warranted one further opportunity to meet the case. The matter was therefore required to be remitted for reconsideration and fresh adjudication after allowing the appellants to file a reply and produce evidence. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:45:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83633 A corrigendum issued after the hearing had concluded introduced substitution and addition of charges, and the appellants were denied adequate opportunity to answer the new allegations or adduce evidence. Because the revised charges affected the valuation dispute and the nature of sales to independent buyers, the record warranted one further opportunity to meet the case. The matter was therefore required to be remitted for reconsideration and fresh adjudication after allowing the appellants to file a reply and produce evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83633