<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83608</link>
    <description>Import of fax machines with telephone answering systems was held not to lose notification benefit merely because of the additional answering function, and the Tribunal observed that the respondents appeared to have a strong case on merits. On that basis, the request for exercise of inherent powers and stay relief was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83608</link>
      <description>Import of fax machines with telephone answering systems was held not to lose notification benefit merely because of the additional answering function, and the Tribunal observed that the respondents appeared to have a strong case on merits. On that basis, the request for exercise of inherent powers and stay relief was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>