<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83580</link>
    <description>Central Excise Rules distinguish personal liability from confiscation of improperly cleared goods. Duty under Rule 9(2) and penalties under Rule 173Q apply to the producer, manufacturer or warehouse licensee responsible for contraventions, not to a purchaser merely because yarn lacks supporting bills, vouchers or gate passes. Accordingly, duty demand and personal penalty cannot be imposed on a purchaser who is not the manufacturer. However, excisable goods removed without payment of duty remain liable to confiscation under Rule 173Q. Where unlawful clearance is established, absence of lawful acquisition documents supports confiscation, although redemption may be permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83580</link>
      <description>Central Excise Rules distinguish personal liability from confiscation of improperly cleared goods. Duty under Rule 9(2) and penalties under Rule 173Q apply to the producer, manufacturer or warehouse licensee responsible for contraventions, not to a purchaser merely because yarn lacks supporting bills, vouchers or gate passes. Accordingly, duty demand and personal penalty cannot be imposed on a purchaser who is not the manufacturer. However, excisable goods removed without payment of duty remain liable to confiscation under Rule 173Q. Where unlawful clearance is established, absence of lawful acquisition documents supports confiscation, although redemption may be permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>