<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 152 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, modifying the valuation of the goods to Rs. 1.86 per piece, reducing the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000, and adjusting the penalties accordingly. The importation was deemed unauthorized, but the penalties were tempered considering the prolonged custody of the goods and the specific roles of the individuals involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 152 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, modifying the valuation of the goods to Rs. 1.86 per piece, reducing the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000, and adjusting the penalties accordingly. The importation was deemed unauthorized, but the penalties were tempered considering the prolonged custody of the goods and the specific roles of the individuals involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>