<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 132 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83560</link>
    <description>A stay application may justify reduced pre-deposit where the assessee shows a strong prima facie challenge on limitation and exemption, and demonstrates financial hardship. The dispute concerned claimed exemption for electronic voting machines and sub-assemblies, with the applicants also disputing extended limitation and alleging no suppression. The majority considered these grounds sufficient for interim protection, while one member favoured a higher deposit; the final view granted partial relief on specified conditions. The balance of duty and penalty was waived on compliance with the ordered cash deposit and bank guarantee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 132 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83560</link>
      <description>A stay application may justify reduced pre-deposit where the assessee shows a strong prima facie challenge on limitation and exemption, and demonstrates financial hardship. The dispute concerned claimed exemption for electronic voting machines and sub-assemblies, with the applicants also disputing extended limitation and alleging no suppression. The majority considered these grounds sufficient for interim protection, while one member favoured a higher deposit; the final view granted partial relief on specified conditions. The balance of duty and penalty was waived on compliance with the ordered cash deposit and bank guarantee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>