<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83558</link>
    <description>Corroborative private records, including scrap logs, production and despatch registers, weigh-bridge entries and internal slips, were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and removal of steel ingots, though the quantity had to be reworked after crediting goods already accounted for. Ingots transferred within a composite factory to the forging section were held eligible for exemption where the resulting forgings were cleared on duty, so duty could not be demanded on such captively consumed inputs merely because of record-keeping objections. The duty demand survived only on the balance quantity, and the personal penalty was reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83558</link>
      <description>Corroborative private records, including scrap logs, production and despatch registers, weigh-bridge entries and internal slips, were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and removal of steel ingots, though the quantity had to be reworked after crediting goods already accounted for. Ingots transferred within a composite factory to the forging section were held eligible for exemption where the resulting forgings were cleared on duty, so duty could not be demanded on such captively consumed inputs merely because of record-keeping objections. The duty demand survived only on the balance quantity, and the personal penalty was reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>