https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83548 Undue hardship justified dispensing with pre-deposit where the applicants claimed exemption notification benefit and the facts were said to mirror an earlier case in which unconditional stay had been granted. The Tribunal treated the similarity with the prior matter as material and held that insisting on payment of the duty demand would cause undue hardship. Pre-deposit of the duty amount was therefore dispensed with, and recovery of the duty was stayed. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:27:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83548 Undue hardship justified dispensing with pre-deposit where the applicants claimed exemption notification benefit and the facts were said to mirror an earlier case in which unconditional stay had been granted. The Tribunal treated the similarity with the prior matter as material and held that insisting on payment of the duty demand would cause undue hardship. Pre-deposit of the duty amount was therefore dispensed with, and recovery of the duty was stayed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83548