<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 116 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83544</link>
    <description>Marketability remains an essential ingredient for excisability of EPDM rubber tubing; mere captive consumption does not by itself prove that the product was incapable of being marketed. On the existing record, the Department had not shown actual marketability or conducted a proper market enquiry, so the Collector&#039;s order dropping the demand could not stand. The dispute was therefore sent back for fresh consideration de novo on marketability and duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:06:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 116 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83544</link>
      <description>Marketability remains an essential ingredient for excisability of EPDM rubber tubing; mere captive consumption does not by itself prove that the product was incapable of being marketed. On the existing record, the Department had not shown actual marketability or conducted a proper market enquiry, so the Collector&#039;s order dropping the demand could not stand. The dispute was therefore sent back for fresh consideration de novo on marketability and duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>