<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 112 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83540</link>
    <description>Refund of Modvat credit under Rule 57F(3) is admissible where final products are cleared for export under bond and export is established. The provision does not require the manufacturer to personally effect the physical export, and no additional condition can be implied into a taxing rule. Accordingly, the involvement of merchant exporters does not by itself defeat the refund claim when the goods were exported from the manufacturer&#039;s premises under the prescribed procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:01:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 112 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83540</link>
      <description>Refund of Modvat credit under Rule 57F(3) is admissible where final products are cleared for export under bond and export is established. The provision does not require the manufacturer to personally effect the physical export, and no additional condition can be implied into a taxing rule. Accordingly, the involvement of merchant exporters does not by itself defeat the refund claim when the goods were exported from the manufacturer&#039;s premises under the prescribed procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>