<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83535</link>
    <description>Composite containers made of tin and paper are classifiable under Tariff Item 68 rather than Tariff Item 17(4)/17(3); applying the same ratio as in the appellants&#039; own earlier case, the exemption under Notification No. 66/82 is not available. The classification therefore governs the tax treatment, and the exemption claim fails on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:46:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83535</link>
      <description>Composite containers made of tin and paper are classifiable under Tariff Item 68 rather than Tariff Item 17(4)/17(3); applying the same ratio as in the appellants&#039; own earlier case, the exemption under Notification No. 66/82 is not available. The classification therefore governs the tax treatment, and the exemption claim fails on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>