<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by dispensing with the pre-deposit of the remaining duty amount, instructing the Revenue authorities to cease recovery proceedings, and granting an out-of-turn hearing to prevent multiple proceedings. The Tribunal deemed premature the encashment of bank guarantees before the specified period and directed against further encashment during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by dispensing with the pre-deposit of the remaining duty amount, instructing the Revenue authorities to cease recovery proceedings, and granting an out-of-turn hearing to prevent multiple proceedings. The Tribunal deemed premature the encashment of bank guarantees before the specified period and directed against further encashment during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>