<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 177 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83511</link>
    <description>A reference to the High Court must arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order on the material before it when decided; evidence obtained later cannot be used to convert a factual finding into a legal question. The dispute concerned whether scrap was recognisably non-duty paid, which was a matter of factual determination rather than a referable issue of law. On that basis, no referable question of law arose and the reference application was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:26:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 177 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83511</link>
      <description>A reference to the High Court must arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order on the material before it when decided; evidence obtained later cannot be used to convert a factual finding into a legal question. The dispute concerned whether scrap was recognisably non-duty paid, which was a matter of factual determination rather than a referable issue of law. On that basis, no referable question of law arose and the reference application was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>