<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 238 - CEGAT,, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83495</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged wrongful utilisation of Modvat credit was not sustained because the Tribunal found no mala fide conduct and no apparent revenue evasion in the availment of credit. The duty demand itself was not contested, but in the absence of fraudulent intent or revenue loss, the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:46:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 238 - CEGAT,, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83495</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged wrongful utilisation of Modvat credit was not sustained because the Tribunal found no mala fide conduct and no apparent revenue evasion in the availment of credit. The duty demand itself was not contested, but in the absence of fraudulent intent or revenue loss, the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>