<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 234 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83491</link>
    <description>Penalty was not sustainable where goods were cleared while the classification list remained pending approval, because the list had been filed regularly, clearances were made on the basis of the earlier approved classification, and the delay in final approval was not attributable to the assessee. The assessee could not be expected to suspend clearances merely for want of formal approval, so no penal consequence followed for this technical lapse. The levy of penalty was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:43:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 234 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83491</link>
      <description>Penalty was not sustainable where goods were cleared while the classification list remained pending approval, because the list had been filed regularly, clearances were made on the basis of the earlier approved classification, and the delay in final approval was not attributable to the assessee. The assessee could not be expected to suspend clearances merely for want of formal approval, so no penal consequence followed for this technical lapse. The levy of penalty was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>