<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 187 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83480</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MADRAS reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,00,000 in a case involving the transfer of MODVAT credit between two manufacturing units of the appellant. The Tribunal acknowledged procedural irregularities but considered leniency due to the department&#039;s awareness and non-opposition to the transfer. Another Tribunal member noted the appellant&#039;s questionable actions in creating documentation for a non-occurring transfer to a sister concern. Despite finding the conduct reprehensible, the penalty was reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 in the interest of justice, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s approach to address irregularities while considering the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 187 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83480</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MADRAS reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,00,000 in a case involving the transfer of MODVAT credit between two manufacturing units of the appellant. The Tribunal acknowledged procedural irregularities but considered leniency due to the department&#039;s awareness and non-opposition to the transfer. Another Tribunal member noted the appellant&#039;s questionable actions in creating documentation for a non-occurring transfer to a sister concern. Despite finding the conduct reprehensible, the penalty was reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 in the interest of justice, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s approach to address irregularities while considering the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>