https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83468 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions did not amount to suppression, as their communication seeking clarification on duty liability for an intermediate product demonstrated good faith and proactive engagement with the authorities. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of mala fides and the importance of establishing fraud or wilful misstatement to justify duty demands beyond the standard limitation period. Consequently, the impugned order imposing duty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 07 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:44:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83468 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions did not amount to suppression, as their communication seeking clarification on duty liability for an intermediate product demonstrated good faith and proactive engagement with the authorities. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of mala fides and the importance of establishing fraud or wilful misstatement to justify duty demands beyond the standard limitation period. Consequently, the impugned order imposing duty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83468