https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83443 Import under an automatic licence was confined to goods required for manufacture of final products expressly covered by the licence and supporting registration certificate, and customs could not enlarge the licence by implying an unendorsed end-product. On that basis, styrene monomer was held not importable under the licence as issued, so confiscation was upheld. However, the omission was treated as a licensing defect of a technical nature rather than a substantive abuse, and the redemption fine was reduced substantially with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 07 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:31:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83443 Import under an automatic licence was confined to goods required for manufacture of final products expressly covered by the licence and supporting registration certificate, and customs could not enlarge the licence by implying an unendorsed end-product. On that basis, styrene monomer was held not importable under the licence as issued, so confiscation was upheld. However, the omission was treated as a licensing defect of a technical nature rather than a substantive abuse, and the redemption fine was reduced substantially with consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83443