https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83440 An unclear customs adjudication order that failed to specify the basis for confiscation, the redemption fine, or the quantum and sustainment of any duty demand was treated as cryptic and indicative of non-application of mind. The defect justified setting aside the order and remitting the matter for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. A fresh hearing was also directed before another officer of equivalent rank, rather than the original adjudicating officer. en-us Sat, 26 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:25:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83440 An unclear customs adjudication order that failed to specify the basis for confiscation, the redemption fine, or the quantum and sustainment of any duty demand was treated as cryptic and indicative of non-application of mind. The defect justified setting aside the order and remitting the matter for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. A fresh hearing was also directed before another officer of equivalent rank, rather than the original adjudicating officer. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 26 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83440