<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 176 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83436</link>
    <description>Transferred REP licences could not invoke Exim Policy flexibility provisions for import of the disputed goods, because the policy expressly denied that benefit to transferred licences and the goods had been assessed as office machines without challenge to that classification. The objection to import was therefore sustained. On confiscation, however, the importer&#039;s belief that the goods were importable as non-OGL capital goods was treated as bona fide, making the personal penalty and the high redemption fine excessive. Confiscation remained in place, but the personal penalty was set aside and the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 20,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 176 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83436</link>
      <description>Transferred REP licences could not invoke Exim Policy flexibility provisions for import of the disputed goods, because the policy expressly denied that benefit to transferred licences and the goods had been assessed as office machines without challenge to that classification. The objection to import was therefore sustained. On confiscation, however, the importer&#039;s belief that the goods were importable as non-OGL capital goods was treated as bona fide, making the personal penalty and the high redemption fine excessive. Confiscation remained in place, but the personal penalty was set aside and the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 20,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>