<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 102 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83420</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of Rovimix-Stay C turns on whether it is a preparation used in animal feeding or Vitamin C and its derivatives. Heading 23.09 is confined to animal-feed products obtained through processing of vegetable or animal materials; absent evidence of such processing, classification under that heading was not considered appropriate. Classification under the Vitamin C entry requires examination of the relevant chapter notes and product literature. Procedural fairness also required fresh consideration because the assessment was made ex parte, the chemical report was not shown to have been furnished, and the report was relied upon without independent consideration. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing, leaving classification open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:58:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 102 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83420</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of Rovimix-Stay C turns on whether it is a preparation used in animal feeding or Vitamin C and its derivatives. Heading 23.09 is confined to animal-feed products obtained through processing of vegetable or animal materials; absent evidence of such processing, classification under that heading was not considered appropriate. Classification under the Vitamin C entry requires examination of the relevant chapter notes and product literature. Procedural fairness also required fresh consideration because the assessment was made ex parte, the chemical report was not shown to have been furnished, and the report was relied upon without independent consideration. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing, leaving classification open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>